The costs, and direct vs regular
The expense ratio and what it eats
Costs are quiet, so people ignore them, but they compound against you just as returns compound for you. This is the lesson that pays for itself.
This lesson teaches a concept for the NISM Series V-A exam. It is education, not financial advice.
- 1
Every fund charges an expense ratio, or TER, a yearly cost taken from the fund's assets.
- 2
A lower expense ratio means more of the return stays with the investor, year after year.
- 3
SEBI caps the expense ratio, and the cap depends on the fund type and its size.
- 4
A direct plan has a lower expense ratio than a regular plan, because it carries no distributor commission.
On the exact same fund, a direct plan quietly returns a little more each year than a regular plan, purely from lower cost.
Practice
๐ฅ 0 streakReal exam format. Answer by voice, tap, or press 1 to 4. No negative marking, so always attempt.
The expense ratio (TER) is:
A lower expense ratio means:
Compared with a regular plan, a direct plan has:
The expense ratio is capped by:
Ask the coach
PremiumStuck on this topic? Premium members ask the AI coach and get a plain-English answer, on the spot. See premium
Education for the exam, not financial advice. Answers can be wrong, so confirm figures against the workbook.